How to judge photographers and their works

The ability of a photographer is judged by many aspects. At the general level, is the photographer known and for what? A sole shooter may have the most beautiful works but without a market, the collectible nature of his or her works will only be aesthetic. Contribute on the other hand, and the market can reward the photographer from a fine art standpoint. Weekend warriors ultimately find that adding the commercial side to their career can be the vehicle to open a door to their fine art passions.
Specifics to judging a photographer’s print vary but include: how is the print conceived, printed and released; is or was the quality of the photograph printed “optimally;” when was the photograph printed vs. when was it taken, is the photographer shooting for the artistic vs. the photojournalist nature of the image; how many images were printed and in what physical, image size. These are only a group of the key determinants to how photographers and their works are judged by dealers today. However, the power of a photograph remains the beauty or response that a photograph gives a viewer, collector or for that matter it’s creator, the photographer.
John Loengard - Richard Avedon @ GALLERY M


2 Comments:
I wonder how new technology and processes in photography like digital cameras, and laser printing will affect how photography will be collected. Will vintage prints see a increase in value by their vary nature of being a “traditional print” or will there be a splintering of categories with their own set of criteria to determine value be they gelatin silver or laser jet?
From what the art world has demonstrated historically the "rarer the dearer." This isn't just an art phenom but basic supply and demand forces.
Post a Comment
<< Home