DNC sets mark for leadership?
In historic proportion, the 4 days in Denver have exposed leadership in America. The question will be: can leadership compete? Cutting taxes for 95% of the majority of America would be a great thing. How do you pay for the rise in food, gas, and health care? The oil addiction is a function of poor policy, misguided marketing and lacking leadership. Today leaves us with an opportunity to change the course of history. This is reflective of times past. Obama wants to waste time with nuclear energy, harness clean coal and support the established auto industry - per his evening speech at Invesco Field. Will the next convention lead to the same blind support of failed policies? If so, will our leadership end in the motorcycle diary that each American never expected to creep up on ourselves in a pure democratic and capitalist society?
As editor of a for profit company, taking a political position is easy: we believe in consumer choice first and political leaders second. Evaluate your election options carefully - as this campaign will lead you to an alternative that either will propel America to great heights or remain the butt of European, Asian and R.O.W. jokes. Consumer demand for a good is by far the fastest vote available in the American economy. Understanding what you see and buy is the core of not just your future but that of the intellectual age. "Hold firmly without wavier to the hope we cannot confess", Barack Obama reference to scripture.Labels: Detroit MLK speech, dnc denver, economics in america, invesco field, leaders and followers, Obama, political leaders
posted by AQ Editor @ 7:31 PM
4 Comments:
True to form, the RNC set the stage with a complete diversion tactic, especially where the conservationists are concerned: drill, drill, drill. Alaska has been auctioned at rock bottom prices for a simpleton with 5 wonderful kids. Cheaper oil vs. innovation - see lubielove.com for insight.
Did Obama just 'talk the talk' to not offend any voter last night? Does he not understand that complete independence in 10 years can only happen with an energy policy based on wind, solar, electric (cars)...not on clean coal, 'corn', natural gas, oil (off shore). Wind can be up and running in 12 months. Who is advising? Now with the Republicans selecting Alaska as v.p. does this mean the RNC will endorse drilling in Alaska? Too little, too late...and definitely the wrong policy.
CollectingPro, with all due respect, you're a moron. Obama is calling for energy independence in 10 years, by proposing an actual energy policy which is lead by wind, solar, natural gas, geothermals, and biofuels, among other such resources as clean burning coal, nuclear IF it's waste containment problem can be dealt with safely, and begrudingly some limited offshore drilling, if he has to compromise on that to shut the republicans up and get his priorities achieved.
Do your research, fool.
nice entry...showing your intelligence. Both political parties have underestimated the severity of the problems and fail to move fast enough for consumers, let alone markets. 10 year plans are bogus when people with a clue can actually get things done in 4 years rather than 10. Collectingpro was dead on by stating that nuclear, which takes years to build, install - let alone decades to contain when and if a failure - is not feasible. Perhaps you did not know that southern colorado could actually power the whole continent with clean energy given today's technology in solar alone - and that's within 4 years, not 10. In case you think this is another moronic response, follow this link to what disasters create and the extreme measures required for cleanup. The aftermath of limited vision people like yourself:
http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2008/09/20/treasurys-financial-bailout-proposal-to-congress/
Post a Comment
<< Home